Dixon's Forum Posts from Dixon

But all that piece really says is:   to enrich their whole profession, our lawyers deliberately overpopulate our Government, theretofore to forge and force upon us way too many all kinds o’ laws, with highly-extracomplexified legalese jargons and hyper-convolutionary legalistic procedures, systematically anti-pro-se-ing our legalary systems, systemically quashing all hope of effectual self-fending, compelling us without recourse to count on completely their crapshoot legalistocratic interventions.   . . .   Win, lose, or settle — all the lawyers in every action reap riches, raked right off the top, with our totally-attorney Judiciary legally validating all of it, thereby securing their own opulent omnipotent government employment forever.

Our Constitutionary Signatories are themselves mostly lawyers and judges; our legal system is expertly tailored perfectly suited for lining judicial dockets with lawyerly billable hours, and they all take full advantage, with the rest of us over the barrel.

In other words, they’ve rigged the system.   . . .  That’s all it says.   The Law may rule our Government, but our lawyers rule the Law, and they’d rather keep that under the radar.

Sidestepping civil scrutiny, they practice this perversion of justice, right here in the bastion of Justice, bare-faced, before the eyes of the world, and get away with it!   Nobody ever sees a thing . . . until now.  . . .   But, that’s 🦶🏻 another story.

I said, “Oops . . .  wrong crowd for that one?   Let’s try this one on instead then:”, and told ’em a steamy-hot, sultry limerick of intrigue, and passion, in frogs, and faces unfroze, and fists unfurled, and untensioned attentions attended the rest of the show.   And that was the best near-death experience I ever had!   The others were all just physical. 🦶🏻   . . .   But, that’s another story.

Who wants to hear “Frogs Agog”?   👎🏻 <“Well, too bad, I’m telling it anyway.”>

<ahem>

<“C’mon, it can’t be that bad!”> 👎🏻 <“Well, I guess you just had to be there.”>

Anyway, having a friend in the Governor’s office sounded like fun 🦶🏻, so I wanted to back the surest winner, and looked for the proven winning qualities and established hallmarks of leadership.

First and foremost:   a lawyer; far and away beyond any other group, our lawyers win election.   And our other big winners — insurors and real-estaters — would serve just as well, electively emulating our lawyers; they’re all in the same huge cahoot, that dominates our Congress, and penetrates our entire economy.   . . .   But, that’s another story.

Next up: what else, a man.   Top down everywhere, leadership is brimming with men, and rightly so — just ask ’em.

Plus, they get more money for the same work!   That could not honestly happen unless they really are better, would it?   Picking a man was easy; nobody else was running.

Also highly important:   tallness; throughout the ages, high tallies of tall people have tended to reach great 🤜🏻 heights.   <“Hey, I don’t like it either”   (for those who hadn’t noticed, I am inverse tall)> All these guys were tall, if you ask me.   But, that’s another story.

I also wanted a candidate friendly to my cause, and found one who also seemed more caring towards children.   There’s not enough caring towards children in our hearts, and therefore in our minds, and therefore, in our laws, and I would very much 🦶🏻 love to find a way to fix that.   But, that’s another story.